Actually, everything is news. This news must also be a piece of news about news. In other words, a sentence where the subject becomes the predicate. But if everything was news, why was it necessary to distinguish between broadcasting and news? This was actually for a way of thinking, for ease of expression.
A news channel is democratic, like everything else. Because according to it, the value of a news item is determined only by the number of people interested in it, and it evaluates all news with this value in mind. Because, like every democrat, it markets itself. Therefore, a news website, in terms of appearance, resembles a dump, just like the mind of modern man.
This distinction, i.e., ease of expression, is due to the meaning of news used in the outside world. We adopt this meaning’s shift: We inform each other because there are things that need to be done in this world. The value of news is not determined by the curiosity it arouses in its receiver — starting with various emotions — but by the news’s ability to convey obligations. This statement, of course, binds all broadcasts, but the distinction in news, — referring to its meaning in the outside world — the distinction we observe, is that its subject and objects can sometimes be more singular, perhaps related to a small fragment of the history we live in. Thus, in addition to the quality carried by a word whose functionality is ongoing for us, it becomes a declaration that we can influence — because we breathe within its moment in time.
This distinction is a design distinction. It can always be suspended. Just like in this article. Because a sentence where the subject becomes the predicate is also within an infinite time, as opposed to being within a moment in time. And again, it can provide us with news that can change the course of an event. What we want to observe is not the distinction itself, but only something that can work on this site.
A news reporter who equates value with the majority’s approval makes good news. That is, it has many listeners. And it must constantly find something new because it serves the imperiousness of the restless human consciousness. But if news is determined according to the receiver, then much has been compromised.
“What are we going to do?” This question must be a crisis. News is the attempt to unfold this problem.